The next idea is a practical way to distribute money in the university for student clubs. How money is handled at universities student clubs, which are fully organized by students is less transparent and most of the spent time in these student clubs are used to organize money.
The idea behind a fair transparent system is to create a money pot which can only be used by the student working groupsstudent clubs. This application process is 3 steps, which are handled once a year to dispense the money between the working groupsstudent clubs.
=== Who can Participate?<br/> ===
Every working group student clubs can access this money if there are students that support their idea and participate in the application process.
=== Step 1: Registration of needed money ===
The first step is for each working group student club that wants to access the money has to submit how much money they need for the working groupstudent club
=== Step 2: Provision of the money<br/> ===
The money pool for this year is defined. This means that each working group student club knows how much money is available this year. With this approach, the head of money can still control how much money is used for working groups student clubs in general. It shows transparency for the complete university.
=== Step 3: Presentation of each applicant[[File:Prototyp AG money.JPG]]<br/> ===
Now after everyone knows how much money is available, each working group student clubs prepares a pitch deck like a startup pitch, where each team presents what they want to do with their money. The jury consists of each participating team itself, that means students, and not the administration itself.
'''''Each team must rate each other team how much of the money, they applied, should be granted. In the end, the mean value is used.'''''
'''''One important aspect behind it is, if your team values good teams badly, there is a negative feedback such that your working group student clubs gets less money.'''''
=== Bringing the project to life<br/> ===
This big change where a lot of risks is involved has to be backed up by a lot of students as well. The idea of how we can bring the university to this change is to actually talk to the leaders of each working groupstudent club. Convincing them is the best way to actually create a change at our university. If we go top down in this problem we would have to convince the leader of the university first. The other way around down to top is a better strategy here. With enough students that are supporting that idea, we can create pressure on the university to actually support the idea.
This means the first step is to convince a lot of working group student club to support this idea.
Utilize support to actually bring this project to life for a fair transparent distribution of money.
'''[3] Acknowledgment '''– Acknowledgment for different student projects
'''[4] Increased Popularity '''– The announcement increases popularity for every student working groupstudent club
== Project #4 Creathon @ TUHH<br/> ==