Open main menu

Changes

no edit summary
*Milestones: Collect Examples, 12/2013; Design, 2/2014; Start Disseminating, 4/2014
== Strategy #2: ________Give Them the Push<br/> ==
Following An excess of promising startups at Nevada, it seems, are an array of strategies that will fully address Gap #2 over stopped in the development stage: either they abandon viable efforts once they fail to win a 2-3 year period:business plan competition, they stop their efforts at the legal and logistical barriers to incorporation, or they find more lucrative job opportunities right after college.
=== Tactic #1: [Name of tactic]Venture Support Center ===
*Description [250 words The Nevada Small Business Development Center is already working on why an incubator for student ventures; this strategy will solve this gap on your campus]*Team Leader:: [Either your nameeffort would benefit from redoubled effort and student involvement. A Venture Support Center, TBD or create a title assigned dedicated space where vetted ideas can go to receive legal assistance and licensure, would help immensely with students’ indecisions about taking the person step toward incorporation. This resource would put wind in wantrepreneurs’ sails—especially those who volunteers]*Milestones: [A set of bullets that characterize the work that would likely need to be executed, along are more inclined toward engineering innovation and have less experience with mm/yy]legal hurdles.
This space does not need to be an entirely new creation: it could instead be an expansion or rebranding of the NSBDC or the Tech Transfer Office. As preparation for developing such a center, interested groups will have to conduct research into the existing facilities (namely, NSBDC and TTO) and figure out what they already offer in the way of legal and logistical assistance. If their offering is already substantial, then expanding its availability and publicity to students is the only needed leap; if there are significant shortcomings or unassisted hurdles, more resources will be needed. *Team Leader: TBD from TTO or NSBDC*Milestones: Research, 1/2014 - 2/2014. Subsequent timeline depends on determined extent of facelift/resources required === Tactic #2: [Name Student Venture Fund === The Sontag Entrepreneurship Competition is a windfall for Nevada’s current innovation/entrepreneurship ecosystem, but Rick Sontag and others only meant for it to be a first step—not a central pillar. The Sontag, despite the lure of its massive size, is limited in its impact. For one, it’s nearly all-or-nothing: aside from the $50,000 winner and a $5,000 second prize, nobody who enters the Sontag sees any return on their work or noticeable incentive to continue. For another, even though entrants are often told that their ventures will receive the attention of investors, this has not actually happened to any meaningful extent yet. A student-run venture fund would address this problem head-on. First, a venture fund could disburse its money freely and proportionately instead of prescribing the single lump sum found in business plan competitions. Second, it could more closely simulate the investment climate of tactic]post-collegiate entrepreneurship. Third, it would professionally develop the students serving as fund members by teaching them to critically evaluate businesses’ viability, which would also inform their ability to plan successful businesses later on.
*Description [250 words on why this strategy will solve this gap on your campus]
*Team Leader:: [Either your name, TBD or create a title assigned to the person who volunteers]
*Milestones: [A set of bullets that characterize the work that would likely need to be executed, along with mm/yy]
Anonymous user