Priorities:Milwaukee School of Engineering Student Priorities
Contents
Overview
Milwaukee School of Engineering is excited to share with you the strategies we have created for establishing I&E on campus and in our community. We currently have a presence on campus,but feel that it is too disperse and needs to be connected, strengthened, and highlighted as a priority in order to educate and excite people about the power of I&E.
On this page you will find five strategies to create a presence of I&E on our MSOE campus that will help students, faculty, staff, the community, and all other people where our outreach extends to learn and get excited about brainstorming, entrepreneurship, innovative thinking, forming creative solutions, thinking future-forward, prototyping, design thinking, and implementation.
Strategies for Expansion of Innovation and Entrepreneurship on Campus
Strategy One: Lack of Strong Entrepreneurial Foundation
Our solution was to create a dedicated space on campus that would allow students to come together, hold events, meetings, run workshops, and be entrepreneurs. This space would enable thinkers and tinkerers to ponder their ideas. It would havea conference roomsfor meetings to take place - especially those involving proprietary information. The spacewould be outlined as follows:
What does it have (~1200 sq ft space)?
What does it offer?
Strategy Two: Improve Overbearing IP/Patent Policy
-
The IP policy for MSOE outlines a process in which MSOE is involved every step of the way and should know of any ideas emerging from use of campus resources immediately. The policy is written in vague terms when it comes to what qualifies an idea as belonging tothem,but is very explicit when it comes to qualifying the only circumstances under which an idea or project is solelythat the of the student who created it. Many students are not aware of this, and many facultyhavenot thoroughly read through the policy if at all. The problem truly stems from the university’s reaction to students creating ideas and jumping on their intuition.
Rewriting the policy is a good start to driving the mindset and reaction of staff and faculty members here towards truly embracing student’s creativity and innovative leaps. The policy should also define a lesser imposition on faculty members to report any and all of their breakthroughs and ideas as those of the university. It should fall under the same or similar rules to students. MSOE claims to have the desire to drive forward ideas that benefit the greater good of anyone andeveryone,but have yet to act on such claims significantly.
Suggestions of revisions are below (in unofficial terminology):- WHOLE IP POLICY: If the idea was of the student and the student has demonstrated control of the project and has been the driving force for the idea/business/project, it is theirs. If the student used MSOE resources including and limited to class time, seed funding, regular use of space, and a faculty champion, they are to attribute 5% of earnings back to MSOE.
- WHOLE IP POLICY: If the student can demonstrate and convince the current president that they were able to do this without MSOE resources or intervention, the idea is wholly the students. If not, MSOE is entitled to 10% equity or royalties.
Feedback: having things simpler might not work - easier to flex things one particular way or another if it’s too simple. In this case, things will need to be more explicit. Current policy is also not explicit with some things, leaving room for MSOE to be overbearing
Strategy Three: [Insert Name]
[2-3 paragraphs]
Strategy Four: Series of Innovative and Entrepreneurial Events
== Once the first step of creating themakerspaceon campus is complete, there a number of events, ideas, and activities that the spacewill be used for. One way the spacewill serve I&E is through different events on campus that are listed below. These include (but are not limited to) Speakers and TED Talks, Pop-Up Classes, an annual Make-a-thon, I&E Workshops, and a number of other events that are sure to pop up as the spacebecomes utilized and available to other groups on and off of campus. These events can be brought to the spaceby student organizations, faculty andstaff, interested students, the community, professors for class applications, the unviersity, and a number of other avenues. Find exampleof activities below. === Speakers and TED Talks
=== Bringing speakers to our campus and ourmakerspaceto talk about I&E would be an amazing way to motivate students to get involved and get thinking about I&E. We would like speakers to cover topics such as startups, design thinking, entrepreneurial financing, and many other topics. We would really like to see the TED-X Speakers come to our campus and present to our students, faculty and staff, the community and any other interested party. TED talks would be a great way to expand knowledge and interest in the I&E field. We would also like to see our own faculty speak about the research that they are a part of outside of classes and office hours so that we can get to know what it is that they are truly passionate about. === Pop-Up Classes
=== These classes are an opportunity for those with experience in I&E to share that experience and for those who want to learn more/ expand their knowledge to continue to grow in I&E. Classes would cover topics such as brainstorming, prototyping, design thinking, and creating innovative solutions. === Make-a-thon
=== An annual Make-a-thonwould provide students an opportunity to collaborate between disciplines and to work together to think in terms of I&E and come up with new, future-forward ideas. This is an event for students to come together, brainstorm, prototype, and possibleimplement andidea that they are passionate about. === I&E Workshops
=== Workshops would be a more hands-on version of the pop-up classes that would allow students the opportunity to drop in a session and learn a few things about I&E by physically prototyping, brainstorming, and creating ideas.
Strategy Five: Lack of involvement from staff/faculty to ensure we move forward
== The key to success through change on campus stems from transparent communication between staff/faculty and students. Tomaintanconstant transparent communication, the campus community would benefit from a monthly fish bowlexercise between staff/faculty and students. The fish bowlexercise would consist of a safe space for students to communicate with higher level staff/faculty who are stakeholders at MSOE and have the power to implement change. The exercise wouldhave havetwo rounds: 1) Staff/faculty in the middle and students on the outside 2) Students in the middle and staff/faculty on the outside. Students would submit any question they wanted to discuss via an anonymous survey and a facilitator would run the discussion between staff/faculty and students. Staff/faculty would ensure that the spaceis welcoming for students to feel comfortable sharing how they feel about campus. The fish bowlexercises could be broken down into categories per month such as academics, student life, athletics, internships, etc. The fish bowlexercise would also be live streamed and recorded for students and staff/faculty that could not attend that month's meeting.
= MSOE Makerspace: = Stay tuned! There is more to come on the Makerspace as we get information and develop the spacefurthur. This will be an exciting space for the internal operations, external operations, community, and students, faculty andstaff at MSOE. It will be a space for events, activities, studying, collaboration, speakers, outside events, community involvement, and many MANY other applications.
Key Features: Movable furniture: Prototyping supplies: Technology: Other:
= Related Links = Michaela ThiryNicholas Hennigan Tara RahmaniSabrina Stangler [[Category:StudentPriorities|m]]